Kubernetes. Under control.

This engagement exists to support one decision.

This engagement exists to support one decision.

After the review, leadership can clearly state:
• Whether the Kubernetes platform is defensible under audit
• Where formal ownership and accountability must be assigned
• Which risks require immediate action vs explicit acceptanceThis is not a technical assessment.
It is a risk position leadership can stand behind.

WHEN THIS REVIEW IS TYPICALLY BOUGHT

This review is usually commissioned when:
• Leadership needs a clear risk position, not opinions
• Audit, regulatory, or reliability pressure is increasing
• Kubernetes has become business-critical, but poorly bounded
• Responsibility spans multiple teams or vendors
• This is not bought to “improve Kubernetes.”
• It is bought to reduce organizational and regulatory risk.This is not bought to “improve Kubernetes.”
It is bought to reduce organizational and regulatory risk.

HOW THE REVIEW IS STRUCTURED

1. Risk & Ownership

• Platform responsibility and decision boundaries
• Access, privilege, and escalation paths
• Security posture as a governance issue

2. Control & Stability

• Operational guardrails and standards
• Upgrade and change risk exposure
• Incident readiness from a leadership perspective

3. Operating Model

• Who decides, who executes, who is accountable
• Vendor and team handover risks
• What must be formalized to remain compliant

Open Source

OUR OPEN-SOURCE TOOLKIT

We also build the tools we use.

k8s-eu-audit is an open-source toolkit for Kubernetes audit and governance workflows, designed specifically for NIS2 and DORA evidence requirements. It runs the same checks we run in paid engagements — available to any team that wants to self-assess before commissioning a review.
If your team uses it and finds gaps you cannot close internally, that is usually the right moment to bring us in.

• audit.letzcode.io

FINAL DELIVERABLE

A concise, executive-ready report that leadership can rely on in:

• Audit and regulatory discussions
• Risk and compliance reviews
• Internal accountability decisions

It provides:

• A clear Kubernetes risk maturity position
• Ownership and accountability gaps
• Required guardrails and policies
• A 30 / 60 / 90-day action path
• An audit-evidence checklist

This is a defensible position, not documentation.

WHAT CHANGES AFTERWARDS

• Fewer incidents caused by unclear responsibility
• Predictable upgrades instead of deferred risk
• Controlled access and permissions
• Faster, calmer audit responses
• Clear ownership at leadership level

Kubernetes stops being an operational unknown
and becomes a bounded, governable system.

EXPERIENCE

Experience from large-scale, regulated Kubernetes environments, including:

• Financial services and regulated institutions
• Hundreds of clusters operated under strict governance
• Environments subject to audit and compliance review

This review reflects how Kubernetes is examined
when organizational accountability matters.

About / Who runs this

WHO RUNS THIS REVIEW

Łukasz Ozimek, Founder

6 years operating 300+ Kubernetes clusters in one of Europe's most regulated environments - including leadership and operational work across European Commission systems, CSSF-adjacent financial services, and EU public sector delivery.
This review is not delegated. Every engagement is led personally. You deal directly with the person who built the governance frameworks, incident models, and audit evidence systems on platforms that auditors actually examined.
Based in Luxembourg. Available across the EU.
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/lukaszozimek1

• Connect on LinkedIn