Governance and operational risk clarity for regulated organizations(cloud & hybrid environments).
After this review, leadership will know which Kubernetes risks must be owned, which can be accepted, and which cannot remain unresolved.
No sales pitch. Clear fit or no-fit after 30 minutes.
This engagement exists to support one decision.
After the review, leadership can clearly state:
• Whether the Kubernetes platform is defensible under audit
• Where formal ownership and accountability must be assigned
• Which risks require immediate action vs explicit acceptanceThis is not a technical assessment.
It is a risk position leadership can stand behind.
• No clear ownership of clusters or environments
• Access and permissions grown organically over time
• Upgrades postponed due to operational uncertainty
• Incidents handled ad-hoc, without a repeatable model
• Audit evidence takes weeks to assemble
Most Kubernetes risks are not technical failures.
They are failures of governance, ownership, and operating clarity.
This review is usually commissioned when:
• Leadership needs a clear risk position, not opinions
• Audit, regulatory, or reliability pressure is increasing
• Kubernetes has become business-critical, but poorly bounded
• Responsibility spans multiple teams or vendors
• This is not bought to “improve Kubernetes.”
• It is bought to reduce organizational and regulatory risk.This is not bought to “improve Kubernetes.”
It is bought to reduce organizational and regulatory risk.
A focused, senior-level review designed for decision-makers.
You receive an executive-ready outcome that answers:
• Where the platform is exposed
• Who must own what
• What must change now, later, or neverNo long projects.
No delivery dependency.
• Platform responsibility and decision boundaries
• Access, privilege, and escalation paths
• Security posture as a governance issue
• Operational guardrails and standards
• Upgrade and change risk exposure
• Incident readiness from a leadership perspective
• Who decides, who executes, who is accountable
• Vendor and team handover risks
• What must be formalized to remain compliant
• Audit and regulatory discussions
• Risk and compliance reviews
• Internal accountability decisions
• A clear Kubernetes risk maturity position
• Ownership and accountability gaps
• Required guardrails and policies
• A 30 / 60 / 90-day action path
• An audit-evidence checklist
• Fewer incidents caused by unclear responsibility
• Predictable upgrades instead of deferred risk
• Controlled access and permissions
• Faster, calmer audit responses
• Clear ownership at leadership level
• A regulated organization
• Operating multiple clusters or environments
• Under audit, regulatory, or reliability pressure
• Engineers “tomorrow”
• A delivery team or body leasing
• The cheapest DevOps option
• Financial services and regulated institutions
• Hundreds of clusters operated under strict governance
• Environments subject to audit and compliance review
After 30 minutes, you will know
whether this review is relevant - or whether you should not buy it.

13 Rue de Peppange
3378 Livange Roeser, Luxembourg
VAT / Numéro TVA LU32093804
[email protected]